SUMMARY AND ANALYSIS OF FOREST INVENTORY DATA FOR THE NC SOUTHERN COASTAL PLAIN UNIT

    The new forest inventory data for the Southern Coastal Plain unit in North Carolina has been released. The data covers 21 counties.  The survey was conducted by the Forest Service's Southern Research Station in Asheville.  It marks the seventh time since 1938 that the forest inventory has been conducted in North Carolina.  The previous survey was published in 1990.  State and Federal field crews are continuing to collect forest resource data in the remaining regions of North Carolina with the Northern Coastal Plain region survey to be completed the fall of 2001 followed by the Piedmont and Mountain region surveys to be finished in the next two years.      
    The U.S. Forest Service and the Division of Forest Resources will host a public meeting to present results of the study on Wednesday, July 18, 2001 from 9:00 a.m. - 12:00 p.m. at the Sampson County Agri-Exposition Center in Clinton, North Carolina.   The Sampson County Agri-Exposition Center is located at 414 Warsaw Road in downtown Clinton.  For more information on the meeting, contact Roger Conner with the Southern Research Station in Asheville at (828) 257-4359 or David Brown with the N.C. Division of Forest Resources in Raleigh at (919) 733-2162.      
     Below is a summary of the findings and some related analysis.

Timberland Area

Ownership

Forest Type

Stand Size

Stand Treatment

Softwood Volume

Hardwood Volume

Growth

Mortality

Removals

 

STAFF ANALYSIS

Overall, the report is fairly encouraging and presents a better picture than what might have been expected given the damage from repeated hurricanes over the last few years. The data shows the continuing loss of forest land to non-forest use (300,000+ acres). This was moderated by reforestation on non-forest land (149,000 acres). Reforestation rates in total for the region declined slightly from the last survey (131,000 acres/year in 1990 to 127,000 acres/year in 1999).

Ownership patters in this region are changing. While private landowners still control 75% of the timberland, nonindustrial private and forest industry owned land declined while the "other corporate" category increased by almost 300,000 acres. "Other corporate" ownership includes lands owned by investment firms, LLC’s, banks, and other non-forest industry corporations.

The data should, at least for this region, debunk the myth about turning the world into one pine plantation. Softwood forest types in this region declined by 414,000 acres while mixed pine/hardwood and hardwood forest types increased substantially. The bulk of the softwood forest type is loblolly/shortleaf pine and about half of the total acreage is in planted stands.

Data on stand size and annual mortality information clearly shows the impact of the hurricanes and other natural disturbances. Sawtimber and poletimber stands declined substantially while the seedling/sapling size stands increased by 51%.

Of particular interest is the annual harvest data. The 1999 data shows final harvest rates have actually declined by about 11,000 acres/year from the previous survey. In fact, annual reforestation rates exceed final harvest rates by 29,000/year.

The most dramatic data concerns annual mortality. Annual softwood mortality was up 111% from the last survey period and hardwood mortality jumped 67%. On public lands, hardwood mortality increased by 421%. The report says that much of this was due to wind/flooding from the hurricanes.

Encouragingly, net annual softwood growth (gross growth minus mortality) still increased by 15% from the last survey period and now totals 253.5 million cubic feet/year. Net annual hardwood growth declined substantially, again reflecting the increased mortality. Given the big increase in seedling/sapling stands, we can probably expect the next survey to show improved growth.

Due to increased mortality, there is a growth/drain deficit in both hardwood and pine and inventories for both declined from the last survey. If softwood mortality had been at normal levels, there would have been a positive growth/drain picture (reflecting the significant growth increases in plantations). On the hardwood side, there probably would have been a deficit regardless of the mortality increases. This would be consistent with increased removals and the increasing age of the hardwood resource.

#####